ICDenTeMS 2024
Conference Management System
Main Site
Submission Guide
Register
Login
User List | Statistics
Abstract List | Statistics
Poster List
Paper List
Reviewer List
Presentation Video
Online Q&A Forum
Ifory System
:: Abstract ::

<< back

Bone Regeneration Comparison of Non-Autograft and Autograft Material in Dental Implants
Thomas Aurelius Dharma, Luki Astuti, Olivia Nauli Komala

Universitas Trisakti


Abstract

Background: Autograft is widely considered the gold standard for bone grafting due to its high compatibility and effectiveness. However, it has notable drawbacks, including donor site morbidity, limited availability, and the risk of infection requiring a secondary surgical site. Non-autograft options, such as allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts, offer potential benefits by avoiding these issues and should be considered as viable alternatives for bone grafting procedures. Objective: This study aims to conduct a scoping review to compare bone regeneration outcomes between non-autograft and autograft materials for dental implants, focusing on radiographic measurements. Method: A scoping review was conducted using the Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework. The review focused on humans undergoing immediate or delayed dental implant procedures, assessing radiographic bone regeneration as the concept, and bone grafts for dental implants as the context. Inclusion criteria encompassed human studies on autograft, xenograft, alloplast, and non-autograft materials published in Indonesian or English over the past 15 years. The search, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, was performed on PubMed and Wiley databases in September 2021. Results: Out of 464 articles initially identified, nine met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 77% (n=7) reported no significant differences in at least one dimensional measurement (vertical, horizontal, area, volume, or remodeling) between non-autograft and autograft materials. Conversely, 22% (n=2) observed significant differences in one or more measurements. Conclusion: The review indicates that both autograft and non-autograft bone grafts generally show similar outcomes in terms of dimensional changes upon radiographic examination, suggesting that non-autografts could be viable alternatives.

Keywords: Bone graft, autograft, non-autograft, dental implant, bone regeneration, radiographic evaluation

Topic: Periodontics

Plain Format | Corresponding Author (Luki Astuti)

Share Link

Share your abstract link to your social media or profile page

ICDenTeMS 2024 - Conference Management System

Powered By Konfrenzi Standard 1.832M-Build8 © 2007-2025 All Rights Reserved