AUTHORITY OF REGIONAL SUPERVISORY COUNCIL AND PROTOCOL RECEIVING NOTARIES IN THE DELIVERY OF PROTOCOLS WHO HAS DIED IN BADUNG REGENCY I Putu Angga Raditya Prihandana, I Nyoman Sujana, A.A Istri Agung
Master of Notary, Postgraduate Program, Warmadewa University
Abstract
This paper analyzes the authority of the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) and the Notary Recipient of the Protocol in submitting the protocol of a Notary who has died. Like the death of a notary in Badung Regency, it was found that the notary protocol had not been submitted for more than 2 years by the heirs to the notary who received the protocol. The focus of the study in this paper is regarding authority Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) Badung Regency in following up on the submission of a Notary protocol who has died. The method used in the research is the juridical empirical, to support this research the data collection techniques used are 1) field research with interviews, and 2) library research.The approach used is a juridical and sociological approach. Based on the results of the analysis, the submission of the protocol of a notary who dies is no later than 30 (thirty) days by making a report of the submission of the protocol, but there are heirs who do not submit the notary protocol to the notary who receives the protocol that has been appointed by the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) Badung Regency until it passes the time limit is more than 2 (two) years so that it violates the provisions of Article 63 paragraph (1) UUJN-P. For this incident, the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) Badung Regency which by law was given the authority to take the protocol but did not carry out its authority in accordance with the provisions of Article 63 paragraph (6) of the UUJN-P. In the absence of an official report on the handover of the Notary Protocol to the notary receiving the Protocol.
Keywords: Notary Protocol, Regional Supervisory Council, Notary Who has Died
